@ryo Good opportunity to rant about that. Jesus was a homeless guy that hanged out with other homeless people and with prostitutes and drunks. His bodily functions probably did not bother him, he had other more important things to be bothered by, like people in general being shitty.

Jesus did not like society, he did not like the people running the temples, he did not like rich people, and the most important thing to own, to him, was a sword, and if he was around today, it would be a gun. The idea that people have of Jesus today is a total fabrication. He would not like their churches, he would not approve of their lifestyles and behaviors. All this based on things that he says in the new testament. He would probably not even want their worship because it's worthless. None of this means that he had no divine connection, quite the opposite.

Of course, the "Bible" itself can't be trusted, it contradicts itself for a reason, it's because a lot of shit in there is completely invalid and made up by the Roman government and the church, to control the population and to corrupt the actual teachings of Jesus, and eventually drag his name through the mud (Christianity might as well be a dirty word at this point, most "Christians" are the very opposite of Christ-like). It's a compilation of texts (and some were left out), so there was never any reason to assume that they are all equally legitimate. It's also silly to see them as one thing, especially when you basically have Judaism in there with all of its typical evil shit. Not to mention how horrible the translations tend to be. But of course, it's safe to assume that the parts that are very inconvenient for them are probably completely true.

"And again I say to you: It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of heaven."
-Jesus Christ

You know that this quote is true because it's very inconvenient for the churches, governments and corporations, that have weaponized the concept of Christ for their own benefit. Particularly the Vatican and their trillions of dollars, while also claiming to care about the poor, while still collecting money from them. Absolute scum, Jesus would run after them with a whip like he did with the money changers, like in those paintings from the Renaissance.

"No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. You cannot serve God and mammon."

This one is also interesting. Mammon is a demon that means literally money. Money was considered a demonic entity, even in medieval times. It absolutely makes sense. You can see it, it's an evil force that almost literally possesses people. People today are completely and utterly enslaved and controlled by Mammon.

Also, you can't serve two masters. This means that if you serve God (if you even want to use that word, it's optional, and if you even want to use the word serve, that is also optional, both of those words have drastically changed, over thousands of years, just like the word worship itself), you cannot serve the government, or the church, or religion, or ideologies. And that is especially the case if you consider that reason and truth are themselves aspect of God. It would have to be, of any force that actually represents good. Of course, we have some access to that ourselves, and that's because we are meant to use it and not just blindly accept what we're told.