Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mas.to/users/kims/statuses/114468800009760544">Kim Scheinberg (kims@mas.to)'s status on Thursday, 08-May-2025 07:01:15 JST</a><a href="https://mas.to/@kims" title="kims@mas.to"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/67357-48-20240730001655.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Kim Scheinberg" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Kim Scheinberg</a></section><article><p>From NYT about capitulating law firms and universities and bears, oh my</p><p>"A few weeks ago, several prominent American universities and law firms found themselves in what seemed to be a 'classic prisoner’s dilemma' courtesy of President Trump"</p><p>I'm no lawyer or provost (or game theorist or economist, for that matter). Maybe I misunderstand TPD. Are there barriers in place that prevent Skadden and Paul Weiss or Columbia and Harvard from collaborating with one another?</p><p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/06/world/europe/trump-law-firm-universities.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/06/world/europe/trump-law-firm-universities.html</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/5019842#notice-9839680">In conversation</a><time datetime="2025-05-08T07:01:15+09:00" title="Thursday, 08-May-2025 07:01:15 JST">about 12 days ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mas.to/@kims/114468800009760544" rel="external" title="Sent from mas.to via ActivityPub">mas.to</a></span></span><a href="https://mas.to/@kims/114468800009760544">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/4592699">The basic scenario: Imagine two prisoners, A and B, are arrested for a crime. ***They are interrogated separately and cannot communicate.*** The authorities offer each prisoner a deal:  If both remain silent (cooperate), they will receive a light sentence (e.g., 1 year in prison). If one prisoner confesses (defects) and the other remains silent, the confessor goes free, and the other receives a heavy sentence (e.g., 3 years). If both prisoners confess, they will both receive a moderate sentence (e.g., 2 years)</a></label><br><a href="https://media.mas.to/media_attachments/files/114/468/790/190/212/481/original/879eab895529b430.jpeg" rel="external">https://media.mas.to/media_attachments/files/114/468/790/190/212/481/original/879eab895529b430.jpeg</a></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Kim Scheinberg (kims@mas.to)'s status on Thursday, 08-May-2025 07:01:15 JST Kim Scheinberg
From NYT about capitulating law firms and universities and bears, oh my
"A few weeks ago, several prominent American universities and law firms found themselves in what seemed to be a 'classic prisoner’s dilemma' courtesy of President Trump"
I'm no lawyer or provost (or game theorist or economist, for that matter). Maybe I misunderstand TPD. Are there barriers in place that prevent Skadden and Paul Weiss or Columbia and Harvard from collaborating with one another?
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/06/world/europe/trump-law-firm-universities.html
In conversationabout 12 days ago from mas.topermalink
Attachments
1. The basic scenario: Imagine two prisoners, A and B, are arrested for a crime. ***They are interrogated separately and cannot communicate.*** The authorities offer each prisoner a deal: If both remain silent (cooperate), they will receive a light sentence (e.g., 1 year in prison). If one prisoner confesses (defects) and the other remains silent, the confessor goes free, and the other receives a heavy sentence (e.g., 3 years). If both prisoners confess, they will both receive a moderate sentence (e.g., 2 years)
  https://media.mas.to/media_attachments/files/114/468/790/190/212/481/original/879eab895529b430.jpeg

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice