@fossunleashed Since one of the lesser known points of the (A)GPL (and what makes it actually enforceable) is that it doesn't compel others to do anything with software they've written themselves; it's clearly delimited as the software licensed under the AGPL and isn't "viral" except in the sense it applies to derivative works.
I am not a lawyer but having a licensing condition that compels you to do stuff with _your_ work might not hold up well in court.