@faassen @dpnash > the question is whether it's primarily a product of improvement to programming language and environments rather than hardware
I’m arguing that yes, absolutely, to a very large extent that’s exactly what it is. There’s nothing about Swift optionals that couldn’t have run on 1985 hardware.
> it became successful using Objective C, which goes back to the 80s
ref unc: what is “it” here??
> I do believe language innovation is empowering, for me personally more than llms
Same, 100%