Embed Notice

@mmasnick @davidbcohen @briankrebs In the ruling, he seems to be saying that the White House *can* exclude journalists from the briefing - just not based on their opinions (which the government has explicitly stated was the reason)? I still don't understand how he makes the jump from "not abridging the freedom to print anything" to "not abridging their access to government briefings"...

He seems to be basing it on some rulings "Cornelius, 473 U.S. at 806; see also Forbes, 523 U.S. at 682"; I'd have to dig up those.