@charlie_root @Bad_Banner @dcc @phnt

> I mean, it's not like search engines are much better these days.

I don't get information by reading search results, either. I find something that someone wrote. In this case, I just read the text of the bill and then asked other humans in the thread if I was reading it right. (I have no idea how UK law works except that I expect it is more or less sort of like ours, since we're a fork of Common Law, but "duty of care" seems to be jargon that we don't have in the US, for example, things like that. "Duty of care" seems pretty obvious but if it's a legal term that has some unexpected connotations, that's an unknown unknown. And the way we organize the definitions sections makes more sense to me, and there's always a section of the bill explaining the actual scope and this one is just "piece it together from the definitions".)

It's really easy to replace nothing with something but it's hard to replace the wrong idea with a correct one. With something I can empirically verify or something that doesn't have objectively correct or incorrect answers, it's not as much of a problem, but this is "What is the expected impact of this law?" and we still don't have very accurate weather forecasts.