Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://ohai.social/users/pitrouillesque/statuses/114263164047848872">Tombe la pluie - Theespookje (pitrouillesque@ohai.social)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Apr-2025 01:40:09 JST</a><a href="https://ohai.social/@pitrouillesque" title="pitrouillesque@ohai.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/80893-48-20250206093709.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Tombe la pluie - Theespookje" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Tombe la pluie - Theespookje</a></section><article><p>"The ai version looks better" or any similar statement tells me you have no sense of what makes us human, joy, whimsy, or what makes art art and makes us create things. And I disagree it is not the same statement as the one once made for photography. <a href="https://ohai.social/tags/creativity" rel="tag">#creativity</a> <a href="https://ohai.social/tags/art" rel="tag">#art</a> <a href="https://ohai.social/tags/aiart" rel="tag">#aiart</a> <a href="https://ohai.social/tags/ghibli" rel="tag">#ghibli</a> <a href="https://ohai.social/tags/ghiblistyle" rel="tag">#ghiblistyle</a> <a href="https://ohai.social/tags/ghibliai" rel="tag">#ghibliai</a> <a href="https://ohai.social/tags/photography" rel="tag">#photography</a> <a href="https://ohai.social/tags/artdiscussion" rel="tag">#artdiscussion</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4827875#notice-9455389">In conversation</a><time datetime="2025-04-02T01:40:09+09:00" title="Wednesday, 02-Apr-2025 01:40:09 JST">about 5 days ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://ohai.social/@pitrouillesque/114263164047848872" rel="external" title="Sent from ohai.social via ActivityPub">ohai.social</a></span></span><a href="https://ohai.social/@pitrouillesque/114263164047848872">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/4399029">Tweet discussing a comparison of a studio ghibli still to an ai picture captionned "The Ai Version looks better, crying about it won't change that" saying :
"The Ghibli art style is plain, uninspired, and the actual reasons people love it is because of the quality of stories the style has been attached to, and the fluidity and details of the animations it appears in, not the style itself.
 I get that it has an innocent charm to it (hence the fun in depicting controversial images in it), but that does not make the style itself anything special when separated from those stories it's been used in and the quality of animation."</a></label><br><a href="https://files.ohai.social/media_attachments/files/114/263/147/312/519/561/original/75e76543b6db4012.jpg" rel="external">https://files.ohai.social/media_attachments/files/114/263/147/312/519/561/original/75e76543b6db4012.jpg</a></li><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/4399030">The picture captioned in pic one</a></label><br><a href="https://files.ohai.social/media_attachments/files/114/263/147/408/317/659/original/6fa63f0f35d5deb6.jpg" rel="external">https://files.ohai.social/media_attachments/files/114/263/147/408/317/659/original/6fa63f0f35d5deb6.jpg</a></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Tombe la pluie - Theespookje (pitrouillesque@ohai.social)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Apr-2025 01:40:09 JST Tombe la pluie - Theespookje
"The ai version looks better" or any similar statement tells me you have no sense of what makes us human, joy, whimsy, or what makes art art and makes us create things. And I disagree it is not the same statement as the one once made for photography. #creativity #art #aiart #ghibli #ghiblistyle #ghibliai #photography #artdiscussion
In conversationabout 5 days ago from ohai.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Tweet discussing a comparison of a studio ghibli still to an ai picture captionned "The Ai Version looks better, crying about it won't change that" saying : "The Ghibli art style is plain, uninspired, and the actual reasons people love it is because of the quality of stories the style has been attached to, and the fluidity and details of the animations it appears in, not the style itself. I get that it has an innocent charm to it (hence the fun in depicting controversial images in it), but that does not make the style itself anything special when separated from those stories it's been used in and the quality of animation."
  https://files.ohai.social/media_attachments/files/114/263/147/312/519/561/original/75e76543b6db4012.jpg
2. The picture captioned in pic one
  https://files.ohai.social/media_attachments/files/114/263/147/408/317/659/original/6fa63f0f35d5deb6.jpg

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice