Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://sauropods.win/users/futurebird/statuses/114257641403679849">myrmepropagandist (futurebird@sauropods.win)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Apr-2025 00:19:37 JST</a><a href="https://sauropods.win/@futurebird" title="futurebird@sauropods.win"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/31520-48-20221126213630.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="myrmepropagandist" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">myrmepropagandist</a></section><article><p>Which isopod are *you* feeling like today? (tag yourself.)</p><p>I feel like a creeper tbh.</p><p>Saw this on tumblr and tracked down the original source: Invertebrate Biodiversity as Bioindicators of Sustainable Landscapes<br>Maurizio G. Paoletti, Mark Hassall, 1999</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4821659#notice-9444736">In conversation</a><time datetime="2025-04-01T00:19:37+09:00" title="Tuesday, 01-Apr-2025 00:19:37 JST">about 5 days ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://sauropods.win/@futurebird/114257641403679849" rel="external" title="Sent from sauropods.win via ActivityPub">sauropods.win</a></span></span><a href="https://sauropods.win/@futurebird/114257641403679849">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/4393734">Fig. 1. Some features of terrestrial isopod morphology.Six line drawings of isopods with bold labels giving them types:
Runner (Philoscia, an ordinary potato shaped terrestrial isopod)
Clinger (Oniscus a more round one)
Roller (Synarmadillo pill shaped)
Spiny Form (Panningillo, it has spines)
Creeper (Haplophthalmus it's narrow and slender)
Non-Conformist (Schobela round with short antennae)Ecomorphological categories are modified from Schmalfuss (1984). Most of the specimens collected by pitfall traps belong to the runner, clinger and roller categories.</a></label><br><a href="https://cdn.masto.host/sauropodswin/media_attachments/files/114/257/619/026/204/168/original/88e7d83e7b0066b1.png" rel="external">https://cdn.masto.host/sauropodswin/media_attachments/files/114/257/619/026/204/168/original/88e7d83e7b0066b1.png</a></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
myrmepropagandist (futurebird@sauropods.win)'s status on Tuesday, 01-Apr-2025 00:19:37 JST myrmepropagandist
Which isopod are *you* feeling like today? (tag yourself.)
I feel like a creeper tbh.
Saw this on tumblr and tracked down the original source: Invertebrate Biodiversity as Bioindicators of Sustainable Landscapes
Maurizio G. Paoletti, Mark Hassall, 1999
In conversationabout 5 days ago from sauropods.winpermalink
Attachments
1. Fig. 1. Some features of terrestrial isopod morphology. Six line drawings of isopods with bold labels giving them types: Runner (Philoscia, an ordinary potato shaped terrestrial isopod) Clinger (Oniscus a more round one) Roller (Synarmadillo pill shaped) Spiny Form (Panningillo, it has spines) Creeper (Haplophthalmus it's narrow and slender) Non-Conformist (Schobela round with short antennae) Ecomorphological categories are modified from Schmalfuss (1984). Most of the specimens collected by pitfall traps belong to the runner, clinger and roller categories.
  https://cdn.masto.host/sauropodswin/media_attachments/files/114/257/619/026/204/168/original/88e7d83e7b0066b1.png

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice