Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://rigor-mortis.nmrc.org/users/simplenomad/statuses/114229392686238615">Simple Nomad (simplenomad@rigor-mortis.nmrc.org)'s status on Thursday, 27-Mar-2025 07:24:08 JST</a><a href="https://rigor-mortis.nmrc.org/@simplenomad" title="simplenomad@rigor-mortis.nmrc.org"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/109738-48-20230326193314.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Simple Nomad" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Simple Nomad</a></section><article><p>If the CIA approves of Signal for use internally - particularly the use case of communicating with CIA personnel in the field - this likely means the NSA gave them a thumbs up. So this implies that bare minimum no other intelligence agency can defeat Signal's encryption. Does that mean the NSA can't either? Up for debate I guess, but quite likely no for them as well.</p><p>This doesn't mean the platform it is running on is secure blah blah blah, but hey, when you think about it this is a massive endorsement for the use of <a href="https://rigor-mortis.nmrc.org/tags/signal" rel="tag">#signal</a> </p><p><a href="https://rigor-mortis.nmrc.org/tags/opsec" rel="tag">#opsec</a> <a href="https://rigor-mortis.nmrc.org/tags/infosec" rel="tag">#infosec</a> <a href="https://rigor-mortis.nmrc.org/tags/security" rel="tag">#security</a> </p><p><a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/cia-head-signal-use-senate-hearing-the-atlantic-tulsi-gabbard-2025-3" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.businessinsider.com/cia-head-signal-use-senate-hearing-the-atlantic-tulsi-gabbard-2025-3</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4799137#notice-9400074">In conversation</a><time datetime="2025-03-27T07:24:08+09:00" title="Thursday, 27-Mar-2025 07:24:08 JST">about a year ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://rigor-mortis.nmrc.org/@simplenomad/114229392686238615" rel="external" title="Sent from rigor-mortis.nmrc.org via ActivityPub">rigor-mortis.nmrc.org</a></span></span><a href="https://rigor-mortis.nmrc.org/@simplenomad/114229392686238615">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: i.insider.com</div><h5><a href="https://www.businessinsider.com/cia-head-signal-use-senate-hearing-the-atlantic-tulsi-gabbard-2025-3">CIA director John Ratcliffe defends involvement in botched Signal chat, denies sharing classified information</a></h5><div> from <span>Grace Eliza Goodwin</span></div></header><div>John Ratcliffe said in a Senate hearing that the use of Signal is permitted by the CIA.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Simple Nomad (simplenomad@rigor-mortis.nmrc.org)'s status on Thursday, 27-Mar-2025 07:24:08 JST Simple Nomad
If the CIA approves of Signal for use internally - particularly the use case of communicating with CIA personnel in the field - this likely means the NSA gave them a thumbs up. So this implies that bare minimum no other intelligence agency can defeat Signal's encryption. Does that mean the NSA can't either? Up for debate I guess, but quite likely no for them as well.
This doesn't mean the platform it is running on is secure blah blah blah, but hey, when you think about it this is a massive endorsement for the use of #signal
#opsec #infosec #security
https://www.businessinsider.com/cia-head-signal-use-senate-hearing-the-atlantic-tulsi-gabbard-2025-3
In conversationabout a year ago from rigor-mortis.nmrc.orgpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: i.insider.com
  CIA director John Ratcliffe defends involvement in botched Signal chat, denies sharing classified information
  from Grace Eliza Goodwin
  John Ratcliffe said in a Senate hearing that the use of Signal is permitted by the CIA.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice