Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://infosec.exchange/users/tomatospy/statuses/114157315118430606">Tom Uren (tomatospy@infosec.exchange)'s status on Friday, 14-Mar-2025 08:35:05 JST</a><a href="https://infosec.exchange/@tomatospy" title="tomatospy@infosec.exchange"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/334684-48-20250313233505.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Tom Uren" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Tom Uren</a><div><a href="https://infosec.exchange/@mdh/114154940352406186" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/184828" title="mdh@infosec.exchange">Mark</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/206678" title="euroinfosec@infosec.exchange">Mathew J. Schwartz</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://infosec.exchange/@mdh">@mdh</a> <a href="https://cyberplace.social/@GossiTheDog">@GossiTheDog</a> <a href="https://infosec.exchange/@euroinfosec">@euroinfosec</a> </p><p>Yes. That’s right, Google <a href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/adversarial-misuse-generative-ai" rel="nofollow">https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/adversarial-misuse-generative-ai</a> and OpenAI <a href="https://cdn.openai.com/threat-intelligence-reports/influence-and-cyber-operations-an-update_October-2024.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://cdn.openai.com/threat-intelligence-reports/influence-and-cyber-operations-an-update_October-2024.pdf</a> have said that it is being used.</p><p>These reports are both based on examining how AI models are being used. </p><p>My guess is the disconnect arises because from an incident response perspective use of AI tools is not obvious.</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4724439#notice-9258909">In conversation</a><time datetime="2025-03-14T08:35:05+09:00" title="Friday, 14-Mar-2025 08:35:05 JST">about 3 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/notice/9258909" rel="external" title="Sent from gnusocial.jp via ActivityPub">gnusocial.jp</a></span></span><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/notice/9258909">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: storage.googleapis.com</div><h5><a href="https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/adversarial-misuse-generative-ai">Adversarial Misuse of Generative AI | Google Cloud Blog</a></h5><div></div></header><div>We share our findings on government-backed and information operations threat actor use of the Gemini web application.</div><footer></footer></article></li><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/4295876">Untitled attachment</a></label><br></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Tom Uren (tomatospy@infosec.exchange)'s status on Friday, 14-Mar-2025 08:35:05 JSTTom Uren
in reply to
@mdh @GossiTheDog @euroinfosec
Yes. That’s right, Google https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/adversarial-misuse-generative-ai and OpenAI https://cdn.openai.com/threat-intelligence-reports/influence-and-cyber-operations-an-update_October-2024.pdf have said that it is being used.
These reports are both based on examining how AI models are being used.
My guess is the disconnect arises because from an incident response perspective use of AI tools is not obvious.
In conversation3 months ago from gnusocial.jppermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: storage.googleapis.com
  Adversarial Misuse of Generative AI | Google Cloud Blog
  We share our findings on government-backed and information operations threat actor use of the Gemini web application.
2. Untitled attachment

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice