Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/users/openrightsgroup/statuses/114156373510928567">Open Rights Group (openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org)'s status on Friday, 14-Mar-2025 04:17:43 JST</a><a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/@openrightsgroup" title="openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/117192-48-20230506132411.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Open Rights Group" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Open Rights Group</a><div><a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/@openrightsgroup/114156365677855655" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a></div></section><article><p>UK MPs have joined the chorus of voices wanting the Apple case to be held in public.</p><p>"If the Home Office wants to have effectively unfettered access to the private data of the (innocent) general public, they should explain their case in front of the public."</p><p>🗣️ David Davis MP.</p><p>"People deserve to know what's happening to their private personal information."</p><p>🗣️ Victoria Collins MP.</p><p><a href="https://news.sky.com/story/apple-vs-home-office-encryption-court-battle-must-be-held-in-public-say-mps-13327371" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://news.sky.com/story/apple-vs-home-office-encryption-court-battle-must-be-held-in-public-say-mps-13327371</a></p><p><a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/encryption" rel="tag">#encryption</a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/e2ee" rel="tag">#e2ee</a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/Apple" rel="tag">#Apple</a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/privacy" rel="tag">#privacy</a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/security" rel="tag">#security</a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/cybersecurity" rel="tag">#cybersecurity</a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/ukpolitics" rel="tag">#ukpolitics</a> <a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/tags/ukpol" rel="tag">#ukpol</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4726717#notice-9256203">In conversation</a><time datetime="2025-03-14T04:17:43+09:00" title="Friday, 14-Mar-2025 04:17:43 JST">about 21 days ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/@openrightsgroup/114156373510928567" rel="external" title="Sent from social.openrightsgroup.org via ActivityPub">social.openrightsgroup.org</a></span></span><a href="https://social.openrightsgroup.org/@openrightsgroup/114156373510928567">permalink</a></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Open Rights Group (openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org)'s status on Friday, 14-Mar-2025 04:17:43 JST Open Rights Group
in reply to
UK MPs have joined the chorus of voices wanting the Apple case to be held in public.
"If the Home Office wants to have effectively unfettered access to the private data of the (innocent) general public, they should explain their case in front of the public."
🗣️ David Davis MP.
"People deserve to know what's happening to their private personal information."
🗣️ Victoria Collins MP.
https://news.sky.com/story/apple-vs-home-office-encryption-court-battle-must-be-held-in-public-say-mps-13327371
#encryption #e2ee #Apple #privacy #security #cybersecurity #ukpolitics #ukpol
In conversationabout 21 days ago from social.openrightsgroup.orgpermalink

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice