Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://post.lurk.org/users/rra/statuses/114142836723650412">𝓻𝓻𝓪 (rra@post.lurk.org)'s status on Tuesday, 11-Mar-2025 17:33:33 JST</a><a href="https://post.lurk.org/@rra" title="rra@post.lurk.org"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/11608-48-20240309123129.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="𝓻𝓻𝓪" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">𝓻𝓻𝓪</a></section><article><p>"AI therefore currently, and under current conditions, only helps to carry on with business as usual[...], and sustainable <a href="https://post.lurk.org/tags/AI" rel="tag">#AI</a> only works as change placebo resulting in placebo change; or to put it more concisely: “sustainable AI is the technical solution to the <a href="https://post.lurk.org/tags/climate" rel="tag">#climate</a> crisis from a techno-solutionist vantage point simply reproducing the status quo."</p><p><a href="https://policyreview.info/articles/news/impossibility-sustainable-artificial-intelligence/1804" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://policyreview.info/articles/news/impossibility-sustainable-artificial-intelligence/1804</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4711925#notice-9227467">In conversation</a><time datetime="2025-03-11T17:33:33+09:00" title="Tuesday, 11-Mar-2025 17:33:33 JST">about 2 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://post.lurk.org/@rra/114142836723650412" rel="external" title="Sent from post.lurk.org via ActivityPub">post.lurk.org</a></span></span><a href="https://post.lurk.org/@rra/114142836723650412">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: policyreview.info</div><h5><a href="https://policyreview.info/articles/news/impossibility-sustainable-artificial-intelligence/1804">On the (im)possibility of sustainable artificial intelligence</a></h5><div></div></header><div>Why it does not make sense to move faster when heading the wrong way.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
𝓻𝓻𝓪 (rra@post.lurk.org)'s status on Tuesday, 11-Mar-2025 17:33:33 JST 𝓻𝓻𝓪
"AI therefore currently, and under current conditions, only helps to carry on with business as usual[...], and sustainable #AI only works as change placebo resulting in placebo change; or to put it more concisely: “sustainable AI is the technical solution to the #climate crisis from a techno-solutionist vantage point simply reproducing the status quo."
https://policyreview.info/articles/news/impossibility-sustainable-artificial-intelligence/1804
In conversationabout 2 months ago from post.lurk.orgpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: policyreview.info
  On the (im)possibility of sustainable artificial intelligence
  Why it does not make sense to move faster when heading the wrong way.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice