Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://hcommons.social/users/jnl/statuses/114037699302381108">JNL (jnl@hcommons.social)'s status on Friday, 21-Feb-2025 04:00:16 JST</a><a href="https://hcommons.social/@jnl" title="jnl@hcommons.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/278180-48-20240827174833.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="JNL" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">JNL</a><div><a href="https://hcommons.social/@jnl/114037397719794335" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a></div></section><article><p>well well well</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4600463#notice-9006546">In conversation</a><time datetime="2025-02-21T04:00:16+09:00" title="Friday, 21-Feb-2025 04:00:16 JST">about 4 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://hcommons.social/@jnl/114037699302381108" rel="external" title="Sent from hcommons.social via ActivityPub">hcommons.social</a></span></span><a href="https://hcommons.social/@jnl/114037699302381108">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/4171875">While changing skill requirements might serve as one explanation for the turnover in the labour force, it is worth asking why management in these firms chose not to retrain their existing workers to take on these new tasks, particularly as the study found that workers were almost universally willing to acquire the necessary skills through retraining and, in the few cases where allowed to do so, performed extremely well. The answer seems to revolve around two political motivations: the desire to reduce the unions’ presence on the shop floor (so as to give firms the freedom to impose flexible job descriptions and to generally use labour more flexibly), and the attempt to gradually purge from the workforce those workers with ‘memory’ of a unionized employment relation, to reduce the risk of future unionization of jobs outside the bargaining unit.</a></label><br><a href="https://spaces.hcommons.social/media_attachments/files/114/037/696/197/428/004/original/58278d7340b1e512.png" rel="external">https://spaces.hcommons.social/media_attachments/files/114/037/696/197/428/004/original/58278d7340b1e512.png</a></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
JNL (jnl@hcommons.social)'s status on Friday, 21-Feb-2025 04:00:16 JST JNL
in reply to
well well well
In conversationabout 4 months ago from hcommons.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. While changing skill requirements might serve as one explanation for the turnover in the labour force, it is worth asking why management in these firms chose not to retrain their existing workers to take on these new tasks, particularly as the study found that workers were almost universally willing to acquire the necessary skills through retraining and, in the few cases where allowed to do so, performed extremely well. The answer seems to revolve around two political motivations: the desire to reduce the unions’ presence on the shop floor (so as to give firms the freedom to impose flexible job descriptions and to generally use labour more flexibly), and the attempt to gradually purge from the workforce those workers with ‘memory’ of a unionized employment relation, to reduce the risk of future unionization of jobs outside the bargaining unit.
  https://spaces.hcommons.social/media_attachments/files/114/037/696/197/428/004/original/58278d7340b1e512.png

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice