@feld i guess there could be a lot of dead people that are within the actually living human age ranges

the 200+ dataset is somewhat unique in that no human can actually live that long due to DNA breakdown limits, so it makes for a funny thing to post, but there remains an unseen amount of data on how many records are erroneous but not in such a patently obvious way

usually where there is hilariously obvious error, there is a lot more unseen subtler errors too, though error is -also- inevitable, so. idk.