Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://glammr.us/users/overholt/statuses/114008621562781078">John Overholt (overholt@glammr.us)'s status on Sunday, 16-Feb-2025 00:51:39 JST</a><a href="https://glammr.us/@overholt" title="overholt@glammr.us"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/51397-48-20240125094142.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="John Overholt" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">John Overholt</a><div><ul><li></ul></div></section><article><p>Why is the nonsense phrase “vegetative electron microscopy” turning up in fake scientific papers? Add two-column formatting to the list of things AI doesn’t understand. <a href="https://retractionwatch.com/2025/02/10/vegetative-electron-microscopy-fingerprint-paper-mill/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://retractionwatch.com/2025/02/10/vegetative-electron-microscopy-fingerprint-paper-mill/</a> <br>Via <a href="https://researchbuzz.masto.host/@researchbuzz">@Researchbuzz</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4571421#notice-8949711">In conversation</a><time datetime="2025-02-16T00:51:39+09:00" title="Sunday, 16-Feb-2025 00:51:39 JST">about 6 days ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://glammr.us/@overholt/114008621562781078" rel="external" title="Sent from glammr.us via ActivityPub">glammr.us</a></span></span><a href="https://glammr.us/@overholt/114008621562781078">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/4144055">Snippet of a legitimate article from 1959 where vegetative in one column aligns with electron microscopy in the other</a></label><br><a href="https://cdn.masto.host/glammrus/media_attachments/files/114/008/621/229/121/420/original/843f92ccf0969cf5.png" rel="external">https://cdn.masto.host/glammrus/media_attachments/files/114/008/621/229/121/420/original/843f92ccf0969cf5.png</a></li><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: retractionwatch.com</div><h5><a href="https://retractionwatch.com/2025/02/10/vegetative-electron-microscopy-fingerprint-paper-mill/">As a nonsense phrase of shady provenance makes the rounds, Elsevier defends its use</a></h5><div> from <span>Frederik Joelving</span></div></header><div>The origin of the phrase? The phrase was so strange it would have stood out even to a non-scientist. Yet “vegetative electron microscopy” had already made it past reviewers and editors at several j…</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
John Overholt (overholt@glammr.us)'s status on Sunday, 16-Feb-2025 00:51:39 JSTJohn Overholt
- Calishat
Why is the nonsense phrase “vegetative electron microscopy” turning up in fake scientific papers? Add two-column formatting to the list of things AI doesn’t understand. https://retractionwatch.com/2025/02/10/vegetative-electron-microscopy-fingerprint-paper-mill/
Via @Researchbuzz
In conversationabout 6 days ago from glammr.uspermalink
Attachments
1. Snippet of a legitimate article from 1959 where vegetative in one column aligns with electron microscopy in the other
  https://cdn.masto.host/glammrus/media_attachments/files/114/008/621/229/121/420/original/843f92ccf0969cf5.png
2. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: retractionwatch.com
  As a nonsense phrase of shady provenance makes the rounds, Elsevier defends its use
  from Frederik Joelving
  The origin of the phrase? The phrase was so strange it would have stood out even to a non-scientist. Yet “vegetative electron microscopy” had already made it past reviewers and editors at several j…

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice