@mloxton
Fundamentalism because you argued with the law, specifically "ArtII.S2.C2.3.6: Creation of Federal Offices" as well as that they have no government contract. Its the ideological thinking that they have to be a official government departement to gain certain power.

Your whole Argument Chain is based on those two things:
They cant have a security clearance, because they have no contract and are not a real departement, altho you never considered that someone higher up in the chain just gave them the clearance.

(The "wishful" is just speculation from my side, who knows, maybe you like them having power.)

My sentence makes sense especially when you consider that I linked a trustworthy article, while you counter me with "Nothing I have seen suggests..." so yes, I strongly assume that you were not present during this process so you have to rely on sources and you don't acknowledge them.