Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.social/users/rgarner/statuses/113933752234385291">Russell Garner (rgarner@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 19:51:37 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.social/@rgarner" title="rgarner@mastodon.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/154120-48-20230727132037.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Russell Garner" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Russell Garner</a></section><article><p>Horribly dangerous framing from The Guardian here, normalising the writing of code as something that doesn't have to be done by humans.</p><p>A human always has to take accountability. Always. And the non-human has a worse-than-humans track record at getting it right.</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4494221#notice-8799348">In conversation</a><time datetime="2025-02-02T19:51:37+09:00" title="Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 19:51:37 JST">about 4 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@rgarner/113933752234385291" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.social via ActivityPub">mastodon.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@rgarner/113933752234385291">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/4066882">In a way, the volume’s title describes it well. In the era before machine learning and AI, when computer programs were exclusively written by humans, the term “source code” meant something. It described computer programs that could be read – and understood, if you knew the programming language – enabling you to explain why the machine did what it did.</a></label><br><a href="https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/113/933/746/014/343/154/original/57485157ec93db9d.png" rel="external">https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/113/933/746/014/343/154/original/57485157ec93db9d.png</a></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Russell Garner (rgarner@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 02-Feb-2025 19:51:37 JST Russell Garner
Horribly dangerous framing from The Guardian here, normalising the writing of code as something that doesn't have to be done by humans.
A human always has to take accountability. Always. And the non-human has a worse-than-humans track record at getting it right.
In conversationabout 4 months ago from mastodon.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. In a way, the volume’s title describes it well. In the era before machine learning and AI, when computer programs were exclusively written by humans, the term “source code” meant something. It described computer programs that could be read – and understood, if you knew the programming language – enabling you to explain why the machine did what it did.
  https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/113/933/746/014/343/154/original/57485157ec93db9d.png

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice