@taylan
Val very much intends to be taken literally. though you would probably have to actually engage with her to understand how her proposal is more than just a sissy fetish. To come to that conclusion you would have to assume she thinks all women are just bimbos. Val is inverting the Freudian assumption of penis envy however crudely.

So no, I'm using SCUM as an additional example to show that at the heart of second wave radical feminism theory is the injustice that arises with the division of the sexes. I Think Sulamith's theory is actually of merit but both these works are foundational and monumental for the ideologies you are claiming support your article and yet they are in sharp contradiction to what you are claiming.

are you capable of engaging in a discussion of the theories you claim to know about or can you only write articles where you confusedly construct and then knock down strawmen?