Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mitra.social/objects/0194a397-921f-c6e8-f1f1-f4061b07f311">silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Monday, 27-Jan-2025 02:10:41 JST</a><a href="https://mitra.social/users/silverpill" title="silverpill@mitra.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/85321-48-20230105202807.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="silverpill" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">silverpill</a><div><a href="https://social.technoetic.com/@steve/113893121073113252" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/181795" title="naturzukunft@mastodon.social">naturzukunft</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/283774" title="evanprodromou@socialwebfoundation.org">Evan Prodromou</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://social.technoetic.com/@steve">@steve</a> The statement about null IDs is now considered incorrect, and an erratum was proposed: <a href="https://github.com/w3c/activitypub/issues/476#issuecomment-2563909463">https://github.com/w3c/activitypub/issues/476#issuecomment-2563909463</a></p><p>As for "transient", the spec says "MUST have ... identifiers unless intentionally transient", but it doesn't define "transient". I think if you don't know what it means, you can't do it intentionally. Therefore, "transient" objects are not possible. Problem solved!</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/@naturzukunft">@naturzukunft</a> <a href="https://community.nodebb.org/user/julian">@julian</a> <a href="https://socialwebfoundation.org/author/evanprodromou/">@evanprodromou</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4447935#notice-8714580">In conversation</a><time datetime="2025-01-27T02:10:41+09:00" title="Monday, 27-Jan-2025 02:10:41 JST">about a month ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mitra.social/objects/0194a397-921f-c6e8-f1f1-f4061b07f311" rel="external" title="Sent from mitra.social via ActivityPub">mitra.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mitra.social/objects/0194a397-921f-c6e8-f1f1-f4061b07f311">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: opengraph.githubassets.com</div><h5><a href="https://github.com/w3c/activitypub/issues/476#issuecomment-2563909463As">Conflicts with JSON-LD specification regarding object identifiers for anonymous objects · Issue #476 · w3c/activitypub</a></h5><div></div></header><div>The AP spec states the following: 3.1 Object Identifiers All Objects in [ActivityStreams] should have unique global identifiers. ActivityPub extends this requirement; all objects distributed by the...</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Monday, 27-Jan-2025 02:10:41 JSTsilverpill
in reply to
@steve The statement about null IDs is now considered incorrect, and an erratum was proposed: https://github.com/w3c/activitypub/issues/476#issuecomment-2563909463
As for "transient", the spec says "MUST have ... identifiers unless intentionally transient", but it doesn't define "transient". I think if you don't know what it means, you can't do it intentionally. Therefore, "transient" objects are not possible. Problem solved!
@naturzukunft @julian @evanprodromou
In conversationabout a month ago from mitra.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: opengraph.githubassets.com
  Conflicts with JSON-LD specification regarding object identifiers for anonymous objects · Issue #476 · w3c/activitypub
  The AP spec states the following: 3.1 Object Identifiers All Objects in [ActivityStreams] should have unique global identifiers. ActivityPub extends this requirement; all objects distributed by the...

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice