Embed Notice

@TomF Based on this, in my opinion, GCC and Clang should for clarity stop referring to "Intel syntax" and, taking a cue from ARC, refer to "Alleged Intel syntax", or perhaps "Intel folk syntax".

However, I'm also perplexed, because if there's no source of truth for "Intel syntax", then how did clang and gcc know what to implement? Or rather, how do clang and gcc know their "Intel syntax"es are compatible with each *other*? (2/2)