It’s not like this is a surprise either. The OSD specifically contemplates the possibility of this type of abuse, and worse, and decides that systemically it’s good, actually, because in a deontological framing any other set of licensing rules could create worse problems for the movement. Even worse: I agree. I still think this is correct and “ethical source” licensing is a dead end. But we can’t stop the conversation there! “Licenses can’t solve ethics, so, I guess we can’t have ethics”