I respect your subjective opinion about the site, though I suspect it's largely influenced by starting from a false belief. it's very hard to overcome such bamboozles, precisely because they twist future perceptions.

still, I'd be very interested in having a deeper understanding of what it is that offends your sensibility on that site, and in passing it on to the people who make the web site. would you be so kind as to point out whatever you feel comfortable detailing in an email to me, in the hope (presumably yours, but especially mine) that it can be improved so as to not hurt you and others who share your feelings?

now, your holding him responsible for evils that others made up and projected on him is not reasonable, TBH. he's an extremely kind person, the opposite of the monster that various opposing interests projected on him, and it's that projected monsterhood that did the intended job of distancing people from our movement. a brilliant but cruel move, that I've watched being played out for decades, powerless to avert it, unable to realize how far it would be escalated. those who were part of the movement and joined in seem to not have realized that they were shooting themselves in the foot.

you're deeply and objectively mistaken about your beliefs about his thoughts on imposing gender or gendered pronouns on anyone else. it's true that he does get triggered by singular they, but it's a grammar thing (cognitive rigidity explains it), there's absolutely no intolerance to trans people in it, and that's why he seeks out other ways to abide by people's choices about gendering of their pronouns.

thank you for your feedback,