Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://hachyderm.io/users/molly0xfff/statuses/113761390190616222">Molly White (molly0xfff@hachyderm.io)'s status on Friday, 03-Jan-2025 08:37:41 JST</a><a href="https://hachyderm.io/@molly0xfff" title="molly0xfff@hachyderm.io"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/34789-48-20230824095227.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Molly White" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Molly White</a><div><a href="https://hachyderm.io/@molly0xfff/113761382913678838" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a></div></section><article><p>However, even many of his complaints about supposed widespread bias still boil down to disgruntlement at how he personally is covered on Wikipedia.</p><p><a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/Wikipedia" rel="tag">#Wikipedia</a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/ElonMusk" rel="tag">#ElonMusk</a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/USpolitics" rel="tag">#USpolitics</a> <a href="https://hachyderm.io/tags/USpol" rel="tag">#USpol</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4303146#notice-8412265">In conversation</a><time datetime="2025-01-03T08:37:41+09:00" title="Friday, 03-Jan-2025 08:37:41 JST">Friday, 03-Jan-2025 08:37:41 JST</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://hachyderm.io/@molly0xfff/113761390190616222" rel="external" title="Sent from hachyderm.io via ActivityPub">hachyderm.io</a></span></span><a href="https://hachyderm.io/@molly0xfff/113761390190616222">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/3831530">However, even many of his complaints about widespread bias still boil down to disgruntlement at how he personally is covered on the site. Later that year, Musk complained “Wikipedia has a non-trivial left-wing bias”,42 in response to a tweet by Ian Miles Cheong, who observed that there was a deletion discussion underway for the “Twitter Files” article, adding: “These people work hand in hand with the MSM to shape the narrative.” (Anyone can propose a Wikipedia article for deletion, triggering such a discussion. Although deletion discussions normally last seven days, this one was closed early due to overwhelming consensus to keep the article. Neither Cheong nor Musk noted this outcome, and in fact a year later Cheong reposted Musk’s reply to complain, “I still think about this post and how Wikipedia hasn’t improved at all since then. It’s only gotten worse.”43)Only days after his outrage that the controversy he was trying to stoke might not be covered on Wikipedia, Musk was dismayed when a different controversy — with him at the center — was deemed sufficiently noteworthy for a Wikipedia page. “A two day suspension of maybe 7 accounts for doxxing got an actual Wikipedia page!?” he tweeted,44 referring to a Wikipedia article documenting the unexplained banning of ten journalists who had reported on Musk. Twitter and Musk would later try to retroactively justify the ban with a newly-created rule against sharing real-time flight information such as that posted by the ElonJet Tw</a></label><br><a href="https://media.hachyderm.io/media_attachments/files/113/761/384/787/939/274/original/5cd59a69cdd5cb66.png" rel="external">https://media.hachyderm.io/media_attachments/files/113/761/384/787/939/274/original/5cd59a69cdd5cb66.png</a></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Molly White (molly0xfff@hachyderm.io)'s status on Friday, 03-Jan-2025 08:37:41 JST Molly White
in reply to
However, even many of his complaints about supposed widespread bias still boil down to disgruntlement at how he personally is covered on Wikipedia.
#Wikipedia #ElonMusk #USpolitics #USpol
In conversationFriday, 03-Jan-2025 08:37:41 JST from hachyderm.iopermalink
Attachments
1. However, even many of his complaints about widespread bias still boil down to disgruntlement at how he personally is covered on the site. Later that year, Musk complained “Wikipedia has a non-trivial left-wing bias”,42 in response to a tweet by Ian Miles Cheong, who observed that there was a deletion discussion underway for the “Twitter Files” article, adding: “These people work hand in hand with the MSM to shape the narrative.” (Anyone can propose a Wikipedia article for deletion, triggering such a discussion. Although deletion discussions normally last seven days, this one was closed early due to overwhelming consensus to keep the article. Neither Cheong nor Musk noted this outcome, and in fact a year later Cheong reposted Musk’s reply to complain, “I still think about this post and how Wikipedia hasn’t improved at all since then. It’s only gotten worse.”43) Only days after his outrage that the controversy he was trying to stoke might not be covered on Wikipedia, Musk was dismayed when a different controversy — with him at the center — was deemed sufficiently noteworthy for a Wikipedia page. “A two day suspension of maybe 7 accounts for doxxing got an actual Wikipedia page!?” he tweeted,44 referring to a Wikipedia article documenting the unexplained banning of ten journalists who had reported on Musk. Twitter and Musk would later try to retroactively justify the ban with a newly-created rule against sharing real-time flight information such as that posted by the ElonJet Tw
  https://media.hachyderm.io/media_attachments/files/113/761/384/787/939/274/original/5cd59a69cdd5cb66.png

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice