Embed Notice

@p @dcc @phnt @cereal @jae
>The solution? Host it on a hidden service on Tor/I2P/whatever floats your boat. But now you alienated 98% of your possible site visitors/users of the service

im an onion maxi and garlic maxi, the only clearnet traffic there should be is the transport garlic and onion routed stuff, imho. the internet is broken because corporates want to keep us tied to their 'clearnet'. do i think domain registries and CAs have no sustainable future, yes.

>No, it's a place where people put their computers

all u've described is a form of assymetric warfare on the people, govt (or large corporation that is govt contracted) maybe partnering with other corporates to house their stuff, ie govt sanctioning of who is allowed to have a voice. in its most extreme sense, and we are effectively at that extreme case already. u can reference "independent datacenters" til u are blu in face, i just see oxymoron. they can't exist, they are a phantom, an oasis, i don't believe any claims that independent, govt-sanctioned datacenters exist. the only ppl at a routercenter ought be telcos, and govt, doing the very most driest things of keeping the routing smooth and efficient, but it would be fine for them to communicate with ppl in the area about things that may impact connectivity from one month to the next. they can have a server in the routercenter for that but they cant host other entities stuff there that would be antitrust imv.