Your argument amounts to a bunch of hypotheticals and "what if" scenarios. Yes, a revolution could potentially use the principle of "any means necessary" as a justification to implement an oppressive authority similar to capitalism, but that isn't proof that it will. And then you end with "A revolution is destined to fail if it is birthed through 'any means necessary,'" but you didn't prove that at all. All you showed is that it's possible, not inevitable.