Embed Notice

@Radical_EgoCom
Because there is no motivation, no moral imperative, no logical reason to do otherwise.
If "any means necessary" was OK to win power, then "any means necessary" will be OK to maintain power.
When maintaining power becomes the new priority, why would a movement NOT use "any means necessary" to keep that power? Its enemies will not disappear or give up. If they don't use "any means necessary" and loose, it will all have been for nothing.
A revolution is both the winning of power and the maintaining of power. A revolution is destined to fail if it is birthed through "any means necessary"