(1/?)
@lightweight
> weak 'open source' (as opposed to Copyleft) license is essentially saying "we want the option of closing this codebase at some future point"
If I may copyright nerd for a moment;
As long as any outside contributors assign copyright to the company, the project license can't prevent that, even with a copyleft clause. The copyright owner doesn't need a license to use, so public license conditions don't bind them.