I can't see who you're replying to but this is a pretty shit essay. I won't refute every point because it will take forever. I ended up stopping my criticisms about halfway through because it's clear that you have no actual understanding of Christianity and are just opposed to its core concepts. I recommend adopt a more charitable and open mind towards the faith.

-Jews or jew-run countries did half of the bad things in your bullet points. The Nazis wanted to get rid of Christianity after the war ended.

-The "No True Scotsman" fallacy does not apply here; ironically, you're using it fallaciously. The argument is not "true Christians are always good" - we acknowledge there are bad ones. You have misunderstand the fallacy.

-Christians like Mother Theresa helping people injured by secular countries like the UK are not proof of anything except the goodness of individual Christians.

-Isaac was at least in his teens, and potentially even older, at the time of the sacrifice. The passage makes it fairly clear he knew what was happening, and consented to it, because he had the same faith as his father - Abraham wasn't a murderer, Isaac was willing to sacrifice himself.

-Christianity does not people not to judge, but rather, not to be hypocrites. Don't extrapolate our religion from one verse with no context. We are told to judge others several times in the New Testament.

-Making people accountable for their actions is a good thing.