Embed Notice

@cthos@mastodon.cthos.dev @xgranade@wandering.shop I look "forward" to the same abuse being used to justify further "AI" spend. "Look how many of your developers are using LLMs for coding! It's such and such percentage and if you're curious about the statistics look at our 'confidence intervals'" etc etc etc, completely ignoring "did they have a choice", "did they actually like it", blah blah blah blah. Like if your sampling was just "did they fire up an IDE that was connected to an account that has 'AI' integration" then that number might be very high and you might have a high degree of confidence that is the correct answer for your sample buuuuut your sampling sucks relative to the truth. But hey, does the C-suite really know enough statistics to sort that out?