Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.world/users/Mer__edith/statuses/113583685532053894">Meredith Whittaker (mer__edith@mastodon.world)'s status on Monday, 02-Dec-2024 23:30:34 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.world/@Mer__edith" title="mer__edith@mastodon.world"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/84686-48-20230104015400.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Meredith Whittaker" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Meredith Whittaker</a></section><article><p>📢NEW: 'Open' AI systems aren't open. The vague term, combined w AI hype is (mis)shaping policy &amp; practice, assuming 'open source' AI democratizes access &amp; addresses power concentration. It doesn't. </p><p>@sarahbmyers, @davidthewid &amp; I correct the record👇<br><a href="https://nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08141-1" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08141-1</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4108437#notice-8027691">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-12-02T23:30:34+09:00" title="Monday, 02-Dec-2024 23:30:34 JST">about 2 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.world/@Mer__edith/113583685532053894" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.world via ActivityPub">mastodon.world</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.world/@Mer__edith/113583685532053894">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/3612000">
Abstract
This paper examines ‘open’ artificial intelligence (AI). Claims about ‘open’ AI often lack precision, frequently eliding scrutiny of substantial industry concentration in large-scale AI development and deployment, and often incorrectly applying understandings of ‘open’ imported from free and open-source software to AI systems. At present, powerful actors are seeking to shape policy using claims that ‘open’ AI is either beneficial to innovation and democracy, on the one hand, or detrimental to safety, on the other. When policy is being shaped, definitions matter. To add clarity to this debate, we examine the basis for claims of openness in AI, and offer a material analysis of what AI is and what ‘openness’ in AI can and cannot provide: examining models, data, labour, frameworks, and computational power. We highlight three main affordances of ‘open’ AI, namely transparency, reusability, and extensibility, and we observe that maximally ‘open’ AI allows some forms of oversight and experimentation on top of existing models. However, we find that openness alone does not perturb the concentration of power in AI. Just as many traditional open-source software projects were co-opted in various ways by large technology companies, we show how rhetoric around ‘open’ AI is frequently wielded in ways that exacerbate rather than reduce concentration of power in the AI sector.</a></label><br><a href="https://s3.eu-central-2.wasabisys.com/mastodonworld/media_attachments/files/113/583/684/033/681/847/original/b8bb78ce5bbee024.png" rel="external">https://s3.eu-central-2.wasabisys.com/mastodonworld/media_attachments/files/113/583/684/033/681/847/original/b8bb78ce5bbee024.png</a></li><li><article><header><div>No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.</div><h5><a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08141-1?error=cookies_not_supported&amp;code=1b0ac5e9-193c-4f62-a6f2-ceb1391f7190">Why ‘open’ AI systems are actually closed, and why this matters - Nature</a></h5><div> from <span>West, Sarah Myers</span></div></header><div>A review of the literature on artificial intelligence systems to examine openness reveals that open AI systems are actually closed, as they are highly dependent on the resources of a few large corporate actors.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Meredith Whittaker (mer__edith@mastodon.world)'s status on Monday, 02-Dec-2024 23:30:34 JST Meredith Whittaker
📢NEW: 'Open' AI systems aren't open. The vague term, combined w AI hype is (mis)shaping policy & practice, assuming 'open source' AI democratizes access & addresses power concentration. It doesn't.
@sarahbmyers, @davidthewid & I correct the record👇
https://nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08141-1
In conversationabout 2 months ago from mastodon.worldpermalink
Attachments
1. Abstract This paper examines ‘open’ artificial intelligence (AI). Claims about ‘open’ AI often lack precision, frequently eliding scrutiny of substantial industry concentration in large-scale AI development and deployment, and often incorrectly applying understandings of ‘open’ imported from free and open-source software to AI systems. At present, powerful actors are seeking to shape policy using claims that ‘open’ AI is either beneficial to innovation and democracy, on the one hand, or detrimental to safety, on the other. When policy is being shaped, definitions matter. To add clarity to this debate, we examine the basis for claims of openness in AI, and offer a material analysis of what AI is and what ‘openness’ in AI can and cannot provide: examining models, data, labour, frameworks, and computational power. We highlight three main affordances of ‘open’ AI, namely transparency, reusability, and extensibility, and we observe that maximally ‘open’ AI allows some forms of oversight and experimentation on top of existing models. However, we find that openness alone does not perturb the concentration of power in AI. Just as many traditional open-source software projects were co-opted in various ways by large technology companies, we show how rhetoric around ‘open’ AI is frequently wielded in ways that exacerbate rather than reduce concentration of power in the AI sector.
  https://s3.eu-central-2.wasabisys.com/mastodonworld/media_attachments/files/113/583/684/033/681/847/original/b8bb78ce5bbee024.png
2. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
  Why ‘open’ AI systems are actually closed, and why this matters - Nature
  from West, Sarah Myers
  A review of the literature on artificial intelligence systems to examine openness reveals that open AI systems are actually closed, as they are highly dependent on the resources of a few large corporate actors.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice