Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://neenster.org/objects/e630a23d-1955-44e4-9426-a95c9f1f2f39">mittimithai (mittimithai@neenster.org)'s status on Monday, 02-Dec-2024 15:28:23 JST</a><a href="https://neenster.org/users/mittimithai" title="mittimithai@neenster.org"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/6088-48-20220817204511.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="mittimithai" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">mittimithai</a><div><a href="https://nondeterministic.computer/@mjg59/113581799946307492" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/24727" title="mjg59@nondeterministic.computer">Matthew Garrett</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/262810" title="quasi@peister.org">Yuchen Pei</a></li></ul></div></section><article>Do you honestly believe there aren't very natural interpretations to these categories that evolutionary biologists just didn't think of individuals who don't produce gametes for one reason or another?</article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4085838#notice-8023946">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-12-02T15:28:23+09:00" title="Monday, 02-Dec-2024 15:28:23 JST">about 6 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/notice/8023946" rel="external" title="Sent from gnusocial.jp via ActivityPub">gnusocial.jp</a></span></span><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/notice/8023946">permalink</a></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
mittimithai (mittimithai@neenster.org)'s status on Monday, 02-Dec-2024 15:28:23 JSTmittimithai
in reply to
Do you honestly believe there aren't very natural interpretations to these categories that evolutionary biologists just didn't think of individuals who don't produce gametes for one reason or another?
In conversationabout 6 months ago from gnusocial.jppermalink

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice