But it was a wise decision, IMHO. Think of the faux open licenses that exist out there. Licenses that give you access to the source code but tell you that you cannot use it to build a service competing with the project owners. That's the other side of the choice. If use gets limited, Open looses. So field of use restrictions will always lead to less code being available to be re-used. That's why the "no field of use restriction" rule exists. 5/n