Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://beige.party/users/HarriettMB/statuses/113551326488878829">HarriettMB (harriettmb@beige.party)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Nov-2024 07:01:49 JST</a><a href="https://beige.party/@HarriettMB" title="harriettmb@beige.party"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/281584-48-20240921202559.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="HarriettMB" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">HarriettMB</a></section><article><p>I truly hope the good justices can see through the nastiness and the hate of anyone who does not fit the rigid views of the likes of Rowling, Cherry et al. A total refusal to recognise trans rights, intersex people and their rights, womens rights, mens rights and everyone’s autonomy and personal decisons are all on the line in this case.  It will be a huge danger to all the hard won rights of everyone if this case succeeds. <a href="https://beige.party/tags/TransRights" rel="tag">#TransRights</a> is where it begins, and all our rights and autonomy is where it ends. <br><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/society/2024/nov/26/supreme-court-for-women-scotland-gender-representation-appeal-case" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.theguardian.com/society/2024/nov/26/supreme-court-for-women-scotland-gender-representation-appeal-case</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4076660#notice-7966028">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-11-27T07:01:49+09:00" title="Wednesday, 27-Nov-2024 07:01:49 JST">about 5 days ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://beige.party/@HarriettMB/113551326488878829" rel="external" title="Sent from beige.party via ActivityPub">beige.party</a></span></span><a href="https://beige.party/@HarriettMB/113551326488878829">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: i.guim.co.uk</div><h5><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/society/2024/nov/26/supreme-court-for-women-scotland-gender-representation-appeal-case">Supreme court urged to recognise ‘facts of biological reality’ in sex definition case</a></h5><div> from <span>https://www.theguardian.com/profile/libbybrooks</span></div></header><div>Scottish campaigners challenge ruling that found it lawful for guidance to extend definition of ‘woman’ to trans women with GRC</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
HarriettMB (harriettmb@beige.party)'s status on Wednesday, 27-Nov-2024 07:01:49 JST HarriettMB
I truly hope the good justices can see through the nastiness and the hate of anyone who does not fit the rigid views of the likes of Rowling, Cherry et al. A total refusal to recognise trans rights, intersex people and their rights, womens rights, mens rights and everyone’s autonomy and personal decisons are all on the line in this case. It will be a huge danger to all the hard won rights of everyone if this case succeeds. #TransRights is where it begins, and all our rights and autonomy is where it ends.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2024/nov/26/supreme-court-for-women-scotland-gender-representation-appeal-case
In conversationabout 5 days ago from beige.partypermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: i.guim.co.uk
  Supreme court urged to recognise ‘facts of biological reality’ in sex definition case
  from https://www.theguardian.com/profile/libbybrooks
  Scottish campaigners challenge ruling that found it lawful for guidance to extend definition of ‘woman’ to trans women with GRC

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice