Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.social/users/BenRiceM/statuses/113549609703250313">BenRiceM (benricem@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Nov-2024 23:11:39 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.social/@BenRiceM" title="benricem@mastodon.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/135314-48-20230609185233.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="BenRiceM" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">BenRiceM</a><div><ul><li></ul></div></section><article><p>Today in ridiculous App Review rejections:</p><p>Croissant was rejected because App Review thinks signing into Bluesky, Mastodon, and Threads is like “Sign in with Google”, and they want “Sign in with Apple” there too 🤦🏻</p><p>cc <a href="https://mastodon.social/@rejected">@rejected</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/RejectedByAppReview" rel="tag">#RejectedByAppReview</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4073830#notice-7960326">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-11-26T23:11:39+09:00" title="Tuesday, 26-Nov-2024 23:11:39 JST">about 2 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@BenRiceM/113549609703250313" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.social via ActivityPub">mastodon.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@BenRiceM/113549609703250313">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/3571542">Guideline 4.8 - Design - Login Services
The app uses a third-party login service, but does not appear to offer an equivalent login option with the following features:
- The login option limits data collection to the user's name and email address.
- The login option allows users to keep their email address private as part of setting up their account.
- The login option does not collect interactions with the app for advertising purposes without consent.Next Steps
Revise the app to offer an equivalent login option that meets all of the above requirements.If the app already includes a login option that meets the above requirements, reply to App Review in App Store Connect, identify which login option meets the requirements, and explain why it meets the requirements.Note that Sign in with Apple meets the requirements specified in guideline 4.8.</a></label><br><a href="https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/113/549/579/225/907/718/original/c365c87ad2aa3282.png" rel="external">https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/113/549/579/225/907/718/original/c365c87ad2aa3282.png</a></li><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/3571543">4.8 0 Login Services
Apps that use a third-party or social login service (such as Facebook Login, Google Sign-In, Sign in with Twitter, Sign In with LinkedIn, Login with Amazon, or WeChat Login) to set up or authenticate the user's primary account with the app must also offer as an equivalent option another login service with the following features:(I’ve omitted all the points to fit the alt-text limit, but essentially they want us to use Sign in with Apple)Relevant exception:
• Your app is a client for a specific third-party service and users are required to sign in to their mail, social media, or other third-party account directly to access their content.</a></label><br><a href="https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/113/549/609/467/485/376/original/37212473b7e5bd51.png" rel="external">https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/113/549/609/467/485/376/original/37212473b7e5bd51.png</a></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
BenRiceM (benricem@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 26-Nov-2024 23:11:39 JSTBenRiceM
- Rejected by App Review
Today in ridiculous App Review rejections:
Croissant was rejected because App Review thinks signing into Bluesky, Mastodon, and Threads is like “Sign in with Google”, and they want “Sign in with Apple” there too 🤦🏻
cc @rejected #RejectedByAppReview
In conversationabout 2 months ago from mastodon.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Guideline 4.8 - Design - Login Services The app uses a third-party login service, but does not appear to offer an equivalent login option with the following features: - The login option limits data collection to the user's name and email address. - The login option allows users to keep their email address private as part of setting up their account. - The login option does not collect interactions with the app for advertising purposes without consent. Next Steps Revise the app to offer an equivalent login option that meets all of the above requirements. If the app already includes a login option that meets the above requirements, reply to App Review in App Store Connect, identify which login option meets the requirements, and explain why it meets the requirements. Note that Sign in with Apple meets the requirements specified in guideline 4.8.
  https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/113/549/579/225/907/718/original/c365c87ad2aa3282.png
2. 4.8 0 Login Services Apps that use a third-party or social login service (such as Facebook Login, Google Sign-In, Sign in with Twitter, Sign In with LinkedIn, Login with Amazon, or WeChat Login) to set up or authenticate the user's primary account with the app must also offer as an equivalent option another login service with the following features: (I’ve omitted all the points to fit the alt-text limit, but essentially they want us to use Sign in with Apple) Relevant exception: • Your app is a client for a specific third-party service and users are required to sign in to their mail, social media, or other third-party account directly to access their content.
  https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/113/549/609/467/485/376/original/37212473b7e5bd51.png

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice