Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://social.coop/users/cwebber/statuses/113528231661452497">Christine Lemmer-Webber (cwebber@social.coop)'s status on Saturday, 23-Nov-2024 04:30:59 JST</a><a href="https://social.coop/@cwebber" title="cwebber@social.coop"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/295917-48-20241114200524.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Christine Lemmer-Webber" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Christine Lemmer-Webber</a><div><a href="https://social.coop/@cwebber/113528218437747382" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a></div></section><article><p>Now to be completely fair this is something that Bluesky's devs are interested in potentially changing: there is an open issue to discuss the possibility of private blocks <a href="https://github.com/bluesky-social/atproto/discussions/1131" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://github.com/bluesky-social/atproto/discussions/1131</a></p><p>What I am saying is there are architectural consequences to fundamental design abstractions</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4052458#notice-7918840">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-11-23T04:30:59+09:00" title="Saturday, 23-Nov-2024 04:30:59 JST">Saturday, 23-Nov-2024 04:30:59 JST</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://social.coop/@cwebber/113528231661452497" rel="external" title="Sent from social.coop via ActivityPub">social.coop</a></span></span><a href="https://social.coop/@cwebber/113528231661452497">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: opengraph.githubassets.com</div><h5><a href="https://github.com/bluesky-social/atproto/discussions/1131What">Mechanisms for private "block" relationships between Bluesky accounts · bluesky-social/atproto · Discussion #1131</a></h5><div></div></header><div>In late April (#922), we rolled out "blocks" in Bluesky, as a mechanism for individual accounts to control interactions. NOTE: we will likely post more context about the decision to roll out public...</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Christine Lemmer-Webber (cwebber@social.coop)'s status on Saturday, 23-Nov-2024 04:30:59 JST Christine Lemmer-Webber
in reply to
Now to be completely fair this is something that Bluesky's devs are interested in potentially changing: there is an open issue to discuss the possibility of private blocks https://github.com/bluesky-social/atproto/discussions/1131
What I am saying is there are architectural consequences to fundamental design abstractions
In conversationSaturday, 23-Nov-2024 04:30:59 JST from social.cooppermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: opengraph.githubassets.com
  Mechanisms for private "block" relationships between Bluesky accounts · bluesky-social/atproto · Discussion #1131
  In late April (#922), we rolled out "blocks" in Bluesky, as a mechanism for individual accounts to control interactions. NOTE: we will likely post more context about the decision to roll out public...

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice