Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.social/users/martoiu/statuses/113525887302851935">Mihai Martoiu Ticu (martoiu@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 22-Nov-2024 20:39:43 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.social/@martoiu" title="martoiu@mastodon.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/217106-48-20231124094524.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Mihai Martoiu Ticu" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Mihai Martoiu Ticu</a></section><article><p>German legal scholars emphasize Germany's duty to the ICC: unwavering support for international justice means cooperating with arrest warrants, including for Netanyahu and Galant. This reflects Germany's commitment to equality before the law, its legal obligations, and its historical responsibility to uphold international law.<br><a href="https://verfassungsblog.de/without-fear-or-favour/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://verfassungsblog.de/without-fear-or-favour/</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4050154#notice-7913573">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-11-22T20:39:43+09:00" title="Friday, 22-Nov-2024 20:39:43 JST">about 5 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@martoiu/113525887302851935" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.social via ActivityPub">mastodon.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@martoiu/113525887302851935">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: verfassungsblog.de</div><h5><a href="https://verfassungsblog.de/without-fear-or-favour/">Without Fear or Favour</a></h5><div> from <span>Kai Ambos</span></div></header><div>Germany, like any other State Party to the Rome Statute, would be obliged under international law, and would be capable under German law, to arrest any person against whom the ICC has issued an arrest warrant, be it President Putin or, in future, perhaps one of the Hamas leaders, Defence Minister Gallant or Prime Minister Netanyahu. The opposing view not only misrepresents the current state of international law, but it also contradicts the Nuremberg legacy, which must be upheld particularly by Germany.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Mihai Martoiu Ticu (martoiu@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 22-Nov-2024 20:39:43 JST Mihai Martoiu Ticu
German legal scholars emphasize Germany's duty to the ICC: unwavering support for international justice means cooperating with arrest warrants, including for Netanyahu and Galant. This reflects Germany's commitment to equality before the law, its legal obligations, and its historical responsibility to uphold international law.
https://verfassungsblog.de/without-fear-or-favour/
In conversationabout 5 months ago from mastodon.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: verfassungsblog.de
  Without Fear or Favour
  from Kai Ambos
  Germany, like any other State Party to the Rome Statute, would be obliged under international law, and would be capable under German law, to arrest any person against whom the ICC has issued an arrest warrant, be it President Putin or, in future, perhaps one of the Hamas leaders, Defence Minister Gallant or Prime Minister Netanyahu. The opposing view not only misrepresents the current state of international law, but it also contradicts the Nuremberg legacy, which must be upheld particularly by Germany.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice