Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.social/users/reedmideke/statuses/110896688292382007">Reed Mideke (reedmideke@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 21-Nov-2024 06:17:07 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.social/@reedmideke" title="reedmideke@mastodon.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/108668-48-20230320145057.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Reed Mideke" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Reed Mideke</a><div><a href="https://mastodon.social/@reedmideke/110895392172278032" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a></div></section><article><p>So a transcript of one of the hearings over the search warrant for Trump's twitter account was unsealed, and boy were there some failures to communicate. Govt asked for something like "all communications related to Trump's account" when they actually wanted communications from Trump or his team regarding his account. As one might imagine, twitter had a lot of communications related to that account…</p><p><a href="https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/sites/dcd/files/23sc31%20Attachment%20A%20-%20Documents%20unsealed%20with%20redactions.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/sites/dcd/files/23sc31%20Attachment%20A%20-%20Documents%20unsealed%20with%20redactions.pdf</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4037871#notice-7890350">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-11-21T06:17:07+09:00" title="Thursday, 21-Nov-2024 06:17:07 JST">about 5 days ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@reedmideke/110896688292382007" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.social via ActivityPub">mastodon.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@reedmideke/110896688292382007">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/3532619">Screenshot of text from the linked document
THE COURT: So any person regarding the account is broader than what you just said, though, Mr. Windom. "Any person regarding the account" is quite broad. It could be all the complaints of all of the Trump supporters out in the world saying: What are you doing, Twitter?</a></label><br><a href="https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/110/896/667/713/476/478/original/1efc20f4bd276e91.png" rel="external">https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/110/896/667/713/476/478/original/1efc20f4bd276e91.png</a></li><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/3532620">More text from the document, continuing from the previous image: "So I take it, from what you just said, that you are interested only in -- rather than "any person," a person who was the subscriber or user of the account or on behalf of that person regarding the account?
MR. WINDOM: Yes, ma'am. An agent thereof. 
THE COURT: All right. How long -- with that clarification, Mr. Holtzblatt, how long will it take Twitter between -- with the date limitation and the limitation on any person, to produce records?</a></label><br><a href="https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/110/896/671/544/714/233/original/c2a6dcd629a0c366.png" rel="external">https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/110/896/671/544/714/233/original/c2a6dcd629a0c366.png</a></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Reed Mideke (reedmideke@mastodon.social)'s status on Thursday, 21-Nov-2024 06:17:07 JST Reed Mideke
in reply to
So a transcript of one of the hearings over the search warrant for Trump's twitter account was unsealed, and boy were there some failures to communicate. Govt asked for something like "all communications related to Trump's account" when they actually wanted communications from Trump or his team regarding his account. As one might imagine, twitter had a lot of communications related to that account…
https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/sites/dcd/files/23sc31%20Attachment%20A%20-%20Documents%20unsealed%20with%20redactions.pdf
In conversationabout 5 days ago from mastodon.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Screenshot of text from the linked document THE COURT: So any person regarding the account is broader than what you just said, though, Mr. Windom. "Any person regarding the account" is quite broad. It could be all the complaints of all of the Trump supporters out in the world saying: What are you doing, Twitter?
  https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/110/896/667/713/476/478/original/1efc20f4bd276e91.png
2. More text from the document, continuing from the previous image: "So I take it, from what you just said, that you are interested only in -- rather than "any person," a person who was the subscriber or user of the account or on behalf of that person regarding the account? MR. WINDOM: Yes, ma'am. An agent thereof. THE COURT: All right. How long -- with that clarification, Mr. Holtzblatt, how long will it take Twitter between -- with the date limitation and the limitation on any person, to produce records?
  https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/110/896/671/544/714/233/original/c2a6dcd629a0c366.png

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice