Embed Notice
HTML Code
Corresponding Notice
- Embed this notice@Hyperhidrosis @sickburnbro I disagree on the premise.
My parents were an odd couple, me and my brother were both okay, he married younger, I choose another path, the problem is NOT in finding a woman to bang, but finding one you'd be willing to spend your life with after the time for banging her comes to an end.
The latter might prove trickier.
Also not all of us are here to live a long and peaceful life.
The futurist movement knew very well it would get to this, feminization of society would ultimately be a destructive loop for society itself.
Voting is moot because its a popularity contest, expecially whenever women are brought into it, hard to understand that we walked miles in the wrong direction and now its dark and we've to walk it all back.
The only sane points coming from groypers and the likes originates from taking and readapting around the futurist manifest (albeit, awfully...there's probably a few who can read it and likely even less who did so), but that road is closing because well, yeah, men need war, but don't "need" to fight for ZOG... so the alternative is, fighting against it.
Fight against your homeland and your native society.
Ponder about it for a moment, as it makes more and more sense when you see it.
Where it leads to? when young men will see and realize what happened to their future they'd rampage and burn everything, no matter under which flag, likely the first one that tells them "rampaging and pillaging across is okay, for us, if we are okay for you".
Don't even need to sell a principle or a set of principles, to dissatisfied people, as long as they don't get demoralized, as long as the flame is there, there is war and there will be wars to be fought over land, over principles, over causes and everything goes on.
p.s. women vote for endless brownoids and assorted shitskins, not for security, deep down they want to be in danger because they believe that this gives them the attention they crave for.
Its... complicated.