Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://hachyderm.io/users/pinskia/statuses/113489225397652931">pinskia (pinskia@hachyderm.io)'s status on Saturday, 16-Nov-2024 07:02:32 JST</a><a href="https://hachyderm.io/@pinskia" title="pinskia@hachyderm.io"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/theme/gnusocialjp/default-avatar-stream.png" width="48" height="48" alt="pinskia" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">pinskia</a><div><a href="https://mastodon.social/@andyprice/113464891195400811" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/214165" title="andyprice@mastodon.social">Andy Price</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/@andyprice">@andyprice</a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/@etchedpixels">@etchedpixels</a> `foo(&amp;s) + bar(&amp;s)` is a little more obvious an issue rather than say `foo(bar1(), bar2())`. And yes that has shown up in real code (GCC in fact).<br>See <a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/PR12411" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://gcc.gnu.org/PR12411</a> and<br><a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-09/msg01545.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-09/msg01545.html</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/4008090#notice-7831396">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-11-16T07:02:32+09:00" title="Saturday, 16-Nov-2024 07:02:32 JST">about 7 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://hachyderm.io/@pinskia/113489225397652931" rel="external" title="Sent from hachyderm.io via ActivityPub">hachyderm.io</a></span></span><a href="https://hachyderm.io/@pinskia/113489225397652931">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.</div><h5><a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12411">12411 – Missed -Wsequence-point on functions (example reduced from historical GCC source)</a></h5><div></div></header><div></div><footer></footer></article></li><li><article><header><div>No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.</div><h5><a href="https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2003-09/msg01545.html">Roger Sayle - Re: problem building a GCJ-friendly GNU Crypto</a></h5><div></div></header><div></div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
pinskia (pinskia@hachyderm.io)'s status on Saturday, 16-Nov-2024 07:02:32 JSTpinskia
in reply to
- The Penguin of Evil
- Andy Price
@andyprice @etchedpixels `foo(&s) + bar(&s)` is a little more obvious an issue rather than say `foo(bar1(), bar2())`. And yes that has shown up in real code (GCC in fact).
See https://gcc.gnu.org/PR12411 and
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-09/msg01545.html
In conversationabout 7 months ago from hachyderm.iopermalink
Attachments
1. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
  12411 – Missed -Wsequence-point on functions (example reduced from historical GCC source)
2. No result found on File_thumbnail lookup.
  Roger Sayle - Re: problem building a GCJ-friendly GNU Crypto

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice