Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/users/julesh/statuses/113454203614888360">julesh (julesh@mathstodon.xyz)'s status on Sunday, 10-Nov-2024 02:36:04 JST</a><a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/@julesh" title="julesh@mathstodon.xyz"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/180791-48-20231002164329.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="julesh" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">julesh</a><div><a href="https://sociale.network/@oblomov/113453896889823166" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/241930" title="sophiehuiberts@mathstodon.xyz">Sophie Huiberts</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://sociale.network/@oblomov">@oblomov</a> <a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/@sophiehuiberts">@sophiehuiberts</a> Good question... I found a good list of concrete-looking questions equivalent to CH<br><a href="https://mathoverflow.net/questions/459139/what-is-the-most-concrete-feeling-equivalent-formulation-of-the-continuum-hypo" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://mathoverflow.net/questions/459139/what-is-the-most-concrete-feeling-equivalent-formulation-of-the-continuum-hypo</a><br>but I don't think I have any gut feeling that any of them are obviously true or false</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3968441#notice-7755168">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-11-10T02:36:04+09:00" title="Sunday, 10-Nov-2024 02:36:04 JST">Sunday, 10-Nov-2024 02:36:04 JST</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/@julesh/113454203614888360" rel="external" title="Sent from mathstodon.xyz via ActivityPub">mathstodon.xyz</a></span></span><a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/@julesh/113454203614888360">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: cdn.sstatic.net</div><h5><a href="https://mathoverflow.net/questions/459139/what-is-the-most-concrete-feeling-equivalent-formulation-of-the-continuum-hypo">What is the most "concrete-feeling" equivalent formulation of the Continuum Hypothesis that you can think of?</a></h5><div></div></header><div>There are many equivalent formulations of the Continuum Hypothesis, but I think the most standard one is thatthere is no infinite cardinality lying strictly between the cardinality of the natural</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
julesh (julesh@mathstodon.xyz)'s status on Sunday, 10-Nov-2024 02:36:04 JSTjulesh
in reply to
- Oblomov
- Sophie Huiberts
@oblomov @sophiehuiberts Good question... I found a good list of concrete-looking questions equivalent to CH
https://mathoverflow.net/questions/459139/what-is-the-most-concrete-feeling-equivalent-formulation-of-the-continuum-hypo
but I don't think I have any gut feeling that any of them are obviously true or false
In conversationSunday, 10-Nov-2024 02:36:04 JST from mathstodon.xyzpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: cdn.sstatic.net
  What is the most "concrete-feeling" equivalent formulation of the Continuum Hypothesis that you can think of?
  There are many equivalent formulations of the Continuum Hypothesis, but I think the most standard one is that there is no infinite cardinality lying strictly between the cardinality of the natural

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice