Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://toot.aquilenet.fr/users/civodul/statuses/113425746219075548">Ludovic Courtès (civodul@toot.aquilenet.fr)'s status on Tuesday, 05-Nov-2024 01:59:02 JST</a><a href="https://toot.aquilenet.fr/@civodul" title="civodul@toot.aquilenet.fr"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/8358-48-20220902160733.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Ludovic Courtès" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Ludovic Courtès</a><div><a href="https://shitposter.world/objects/dc49a911-54f5-47ad-9b2b-c4b1479d19a9" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://shitposter.world/users/kakafarm">@kakafarm</a> Well, I’m more on the side of Org, for many reasons.</p><p>So yes, Jupyter “reinvents the wheel” to a large extent (the latest paper by <a href="https://scholar.social/@khinsen">@khinsen</a> has nice thoughts on historical “programming systems” and incidental complexity in Jupyter), but it has become a go-to tool for many in reproducible research.</p><p>Guix-Jupyter thus is sort of a gateway to reproducible deployment:<br><a href="https://hpc.guix.info/blog/2019/10/towards-reproducible-jupyter-notebooks/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://hpc.guix.info/blog/2019/10/towards-reproducible-jupyter-notebooks/</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3933588#notice-7689184">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-11-05T01:59:02+09:00" title="Tuesday, 05-Nov-2024 01:59:02 JST">about 20 days ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://toot.aquilenet.fr/@civodul/113425746219075548" rel="external" title="Sent from toot.aquilenet.fr via ActivityPub">toot.aquilenet.fr</a></span></span><a href="https://toot.aquilenet.fr/@civodul/113425746219075548">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/2674077">Untitled attachment</a></label><br></li><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: hpc.guix.info</div><h5><a href="https://hpc.guix.info/blog/2019/10/towards-reproducible-jupyter-notebooks/">Guix-HPC — Towards reproducible Jupyter notebooks</a></h5><div></div></header><div></div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Ludovic Courtès (civodul@toot.aquilenet.fr)'s status on Tuesday, 05-Nov-2024 01:59:02 JSTLudovic Courtès
in reply to
- kakafarm
@kakafarm Well, I’m more on the side of Org, for many reasons.
So yes, Jupyter “reinvents the wheel” to a large extent (the latest paper by @khinsen has nice thoughts on historical “programming systems” and incidental complexity in Jupyter), but it has become a go-to tool for many in reproducible research.
Guix-Jupyter thus is sort of a gateway to reproducible deployment:
https://hpc.guix.info/blog/2019/10/towards-reproducible-jupyter-notebooks/
In conversationabout 20 days ago from toot.aquilenet.frpermalink
Attachments
1. Untitled attachment
2. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: hpc.guix.info
  Guix-HPC — Towards reproducible Jupyter notebooks

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice