Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://assemblag.es/users/qualmist/statuses/113400720050323582">Josh Horowitz (qualmist@assemblag.es)'s status on Friday, 01-Nov-2024 10:43:46 JST</a><a href="https://assemblag.es/@qualmist" title="qualmist@assemblag.es"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/290873-48-20241101014346.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Josh Horowitz" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Josh Horowitz</a><div><a href="https://mastodon.social/@wolkenmachine/113399356069881071" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/@wolkenmachine">@wolkenmachine</a> relevant quote from <a href="https://worrydream.com/LearnableProgramming/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://worrydream.com/LearnableProgramming/</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3915231#notice-7649916">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-11-01T10:43:46+09:00" title="Friday, 01-Nov-2024 10:43:46 JST">about 4 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://assemblag.es/@qualmist/113400720050323582" rel="external" title="Sent from assemblag.es via ActivityPub">assemblag.es</a></span></span><a href="https://assemblag.es/@qualmist/113400720050323582">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/3384333">text:In his influential essay No Silver Bullet, Fred Brooks makes the case that software is inherently "invisible and unvisualizable", and points out the universal failure of so-called "visual programming" environments. I don't fault Fred Brooks for this view -- the visual programming that he's thinking of indeed has little to offer. But that's because it visualizes the wrong thing.Traditional visual environments visualize the code. They visualize static structure. But that's not what we need to understand. We need to understand what the code is doing.Visualize data, not code. Dynamic behavior, not static structure.</a></label><br><a href="https://sb-assemblagees.b-cdn.net/media_attachments/files/113/400/719/916/634/728/original/bbfae29bb7be7450.png" rel="external">https://sb-assemblagees.b-cdn.net/media_attachments/files/113/400/719/916/634/728/original/bbfae29bb7be7450.png</a></li><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: worrydream.com</div><h5><a href="https://worrydream.com/LearnableProgramming/">Learnable Programming</a></h5><div></div></header><div></div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Josh Horowitz (qualmist@assemblag.es)'s status on Friday, 01-Nov-2024 10:43:46 JSTJosh Horowitz
in reply to
- Marcel Goethals
@wolkenmachine relevant quote from https://worrydream.com/LearnableProgramming/
In conversationabout 4 months ago from assemblag.espermalink
Attachments
1. text: In his influential essay No Silver Bullet, Fred Brooks makes the case that software is inherently "invisible and unvisualizable", and points out the universal failure of so-called "visual programming" environments. I don't fault Fred Brooks for this view -- the visual programming that he's thinking of indeed has little to offer. But that's because it visualizes the wrong thing. Traditional visual environments visualize the code. They visualize static structure. But that's not what we need to understand. We need to understand what the code is doing. Visualize data, not code. Dynamic behavior, not static structure.
  https://sb-assemblagees.b-cdn.net/media_attachments/files/113/400/719/916/634/728/original/bbfae29bb7be7450.png
2. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: worrydream.com
  Learnable Programming

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice