Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.social/users/USAJusticeWatch/statuses/113374427720420713">USAJusticeWatch (usajusticewatch@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 27-Oct-2024 02:24:56 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.social/@USAJusticeWatch" title="usajusticewatch@mastodon.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/282204-48-20240915161028.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="USAJusticeWatch" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">USAJusticeWatch</a></section><article><p>The <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/WashingtonPost" rel="tag">#WashingtonPost</a> &amp; <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/LATimes" rel="tag">#LATimes</a> refused to endorse a candidate. Why? “…this may look like…nonpartisan neutrality… but it’s far from that. …it’s a…smackdown of…staffs who have… expos[ed] Trump’s dangers... It’s also a strong statement of preference. The papers’ leaders have made it clear that they either want Trump (who is…a boon to large personal fortunes) or that they don’t wish to risk the ex-president’s wrath &amp; retribution if he wins.” | Margaret Sullivan, Guardian <a href="https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/oct/25/news-election-endorsements-washington-post-la-times" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/oct/25/news-election-endorsements-washington-post-la-times</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3886085#notice-7596189">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-10-27T02:24:56+09:00" title="Sunday, 27-Oct-2024 02:24:56 JST">about 9 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@USAJusticeWatch/113374427720420713" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.social via ActivityPub">mastodon.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@USAJusticeWatch/113374427720420713">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: i.guim.co.uk</div><h5><a href="https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/oct/25/news-election-endorsements-washington-post-la-times">The Washington Post and LA Times refused to endorse a candidate. Why? | Margaret Sullivan</a></h5><div> from <span>https://www.theguardian.com/profile/margaret-sullivan</span></div></header><div>There’s no way to see this decision other than as an appalling display of cowardice and a dereliction of their public duty</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
USAJusticeWatch (usajusticewatch@mastodon.social)'s status on Sunday, 27-Oct-2024 02:24:56 JST USAJusticeWatch
The #WashingtonPost & #LATimes refused to endorse a candidate. Why? “…this may look like…nonpartisan neutrality… but it’s far from that. …it’s a…smackdown of…staffs who have… expos[ed] Trump’s dangers... It’s also a strong statement of preference. The papers’ leaders have made it clear that they either want Trump (who is…a boon to large personal fortunes) or that they don’t wish to risk the ex-president’s wrath & retribution if he wins.” | Margaret Sullivan, Guardian https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/oct/25/news-election-endorsements-washington-post-la-times
In conversationabout 9 months ago from mastodon.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: i.guim.co.uk
  The Washington Post and LA Times refused to endorse a candidate. Why? | Margaret Sullivan
  from https://www.theguardian.com/profile/margaret-sullivan
  There’s no way to see this decision other than as an appalling display of cowardice and a dereliction of their public duty

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice