Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mastodon.social/users/eff/statuses/113340705961902673">Electronic Frontier Foundation (eff@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 21-Oct-2024 01:32:45 JST</a><a href="https://mastodon.social/@eff" title="eff@mastodon.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/29398-48-20221118013605.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Electronic Frontier Foundation" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Electronic Frontier Foundation</a></section><article><p>Trading away the public's fundamental due process rights in exchange for read-only access to the laws that regulate product, building, and environmental safety is a bad bargain. <a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/10/courts-agree-no-one-should-have-monopoly-over-law-congress-shouldnt-change" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/10/courts-agree-no-one-should-have-monopoly-over-law-congress-shouldnt-change</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3855464#notice-7538862">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-10-21T01:32:45+09:00" title="Monday, 21-Oct-2024 01:32:45 JST">about 11 days ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@eff/113340705961902673" rel="external" title="Sent from mastodon.social via ActivityPub">mastodon.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mastodon.social/@eff/113340705961902673">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.eff.org</div><h5><a href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/10/courts-agree-no-one-should-have-monopoly-over-law-congress-shouldnt-change">Courts Agree That No One Should Have a Monopoly Over the Law. Congress Shouldn’t Change That</a></h5><div> from <span>Corynne McSherry</span></div></header><div>Some people just don’t know how to take a hint. For more than a decade, giant standards-development organizations (SDOs) have been fighting in courts around the country, trying use copyright law to control access to other laws.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Electronic Frontier Foundation (eff@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 21-Oct-2024 01:32:45 JST Electronic Frontier Foundation
Trading away the public's fundamental due process rights in exchange for read-only access to the laws that regulate product, building, and environmental safety is a bad bargain. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/10/courts-agree-no-one-should-have-monopoly-over-law-congress-shouldnt-change
In conversationabout 11 days ago from mastodon.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.eff.org
  Courts Agree That No One Should Have a Monopoly Over the Law. Congress Shouldn’t Change That
  from Corynne McSherry
  Some people just don’t know how to take a hint. For more than a decade, giant standards-development organizations (SDOs) have been fighting in courts around the country, trying use copyright law to control access to other laws.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice