Embed Notice

@report_press If I understand this correctly, the goal of this report is to remove entirely the influence of RMS upon FSF, present and future, and for it to repudiate selected past influences. And to apply pressure, it is encouraging a boycott against the FSF until those demands are met.

That is the stick. What is the carrot? If RMS steps down of his own accord, and retracts all those prior public statements, what benefit could the liberated software movement (not just FSF) expect?