Public
- Public
- Network
- Groups
- Featured
- Popular
- People

Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://gnusocial.net/object/note/18798855">Alexandre Oliva (lxo@gnusocial.net)'s status on Tuesday, 24-Sep-2024 06:07:49 JST</a><a href="https://gnusocial.net/lxo" title="lxo@gnusocial.net"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/1115-48-20220724203259.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Alexandre Oliva" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Alexandre Oliva</a><div><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@w96k/113185270874597957" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li></ul></div></section><article>I agree P2P is better.  individual instances would be a way to address that, but we seem to be going the opposite direction, in which instances' royalties hold power over their subjects</article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3272432#notice-7277423">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-09-24T06:07:49+09:00" title="Tuesday, 24-Sep-2024 06:07:49 JST">about 2 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/notice/7277423" rel="external" title="Sent from gnusocial.jp via ActivityPub">gnusocial.jp</a></span></span><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/notice/7277423">permalink</a></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Alexandre Oliva (lxo@gnusocial.net)'s status on Tuesday, 24-Sep-2024 06:07:49 JSTAlexandre Oliva
in reply to
- w96k
I agree P2P is better. individual instances would be a way to address that, but we seem to be going the opposite direction, in which instances' royalties hold power over their subjects
In conversationabout 2 months ago from gnusocial.jppermalink

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice