Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://mitra.social/objects/0191f0ca-1318-3f35-c9e2-a70803333b28">silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Saturday, 14-Sep-2024 22:48:00 JST</a><a href="https://mitra.social/users/silverpill" title="silverpill@mitra.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/85321-48-20230105202807.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="silverpill" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">silverpill</a><div><a href="https://fedi.feministwiki.org/objects/7d402e80-042c-43d9-b833-592c9eff49f9" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://fedi.feministwiki.org/users/taylan">@taylan</a> I agree that instance admins are often over-reacting with instance blocks, but I don't see how moderation can work on a large scale without such mechanism.</p><p>The situation can be improved by making identity decentralized. I've been working on it: <a href="https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src/branch/main/fep/ef61/fep-ef61.md">https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src/branch/main/fep/ef61/fep-ef61.md</a><br>This solution allows full account migrations (not just followers), and multi-homing. A bit like Nostr, but "instances" still exist as moderation domains.</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3604050#notice-7185195">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-09-14T22:48:00+09:00" title="Saturday, 14-Sep-2024 22:48:00 JST">about 2 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://mitra.social/objects/0191f0ca-1318-3f35-c9e2-a70803333b28" rel="external" title="Sent from mitra.social via ActivityPub">mitra.social</a></span></span><a href="https://mitra.social/objects/0191f0ca-1318-3f35-c9e2-a70803333b28">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: codeberg.org</div><h5><a href="https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src/branch/main/fep/ef61/fep-ef61.md">fep/fep/ef61/fep-ef61.md at main</a></h5><div> from <span>fediverse</span></div></header><div>fep - Fediverse Enhancement Proposals</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
silverpill (silverpill@mitra.social)'s status on Saturday, 14-Sep-2024 22:48:00 JSTsilverpill
in reply to
- Taylan
@taylan I agree that instance admins are often over-reacting with instance blocks, but I don't see how moderation can work on a large scale without such mechanism.
The situation can be improved by making identity decentralized. I've been working on it: https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src/branch/main/fep/ef61/fep-ef61.md
This solution allows full account migrations (not just followers), and multi-homing. A bit like Nostr, but "instances" still exist as moderation domains.
In conversationabout 2 months ago from mitra.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: codeberg.org
  fep/fep/ef61/fep-ef61.md at main
  from fediverse
  fep - Fediverse Enhancement Proposals

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice