Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://journa.host/users/chrisgeidner/statuses/113094197127317045">Chris Geidner (chrisgeidner@journa.host)'s status on Saturday, 07-Sep-2024 12:54:12 JST</a><a href="https://journa.host/@chrisgeidner" title="chrisgeidner@journa.host"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/75697-48-20240516135537.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Chris Geidner" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Chris Geidner</a></section><article><p>The Trump appointees on a federal appeals went wild in a campaign finance ruling on Thursday, a reminder of the continuing harm from the first Trump administration and a stark warning about one of the many dangers from a second Trump administration. <a href="https://www.lawdork.com/p/dick-cheney-endorses-kamala-harris" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.lawdork.com/p/dick-cheney-endorses-kamala-harris</a></p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3627635#notice-7111763">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-09-07T12:54:12+09:00" title="Saturday, 07-Sep-2024 12:54:12 JST">about 3 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://journa.host/@chrisgeidner/113094197127317045" rel="external" title="Sent from journa.host via ActivityPub">journa.host</a></span></span><a href="https://journa.host/@chrisgeidner/113094197127317045">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/3134151">On Thursday, a majority of the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit sitting en banc practically begged the U.S. Supreme Court to upend campaign finance law yet again by allowing coordinated campaign expenditures.For the majority, Judge Jeff Sutton first explained what’s going on:At issue is whether the Federal Election Campaign Act’s limits on coordinated campaign expenditures, which restrict political parties from spending money on campaign advertising with input from the party’s candidate for office, violate the First Amendment. In 2001, the Supreme Court held that they do not. FEC v. Colo. Republican Fed. Campaign Comm., 533 U.S. 431, 465. In this action, the plaintiffs argue that the law and facts have changed since 2001, making the Colorado decision no longer binding on lower courts.</a></label><br><a href="https://assets.journa.host/media_attachments/files/113/094/196/842/276/672/original/07ef39215eca8d09.jpeg" rel="external">https://assets.journa.host/media_attachments/files/113/094/196/842/276/672/original/07ef39215eca8d09.jpeg</a></li><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: substackcdn.com</div><h5><a href="https://www.lawdork.com/p/dick-cheney-endorses-kamala-harris">Dick Cheney endorses Kamala Harris. It really is this serious.</a></h5><div> from <span>Chris Geidner</span></div></header><div>Also: Another reminder of the dangers of a second Trump administration to the federal judiciary. And: Justice Sam Alito's stocks.</div><footer></footer></article></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Chris Geidner (chrisgeidner@journa.host)'s status on Saturday, 07-Sep-2024 12:54:12 JST Chris Geidner
The Trump appointees on a federal appeals went wild in a campaign finance ruling on Thursday, a reminder of the continuing harm from the first Trump administration and a stark warning about one of the many dangers from a second Trump administration. https://www.lawdork.com/p/dick-cheney-endorses-kamala-harris
In conversationabout 3 months ago from journa.hostpermalink
Attachments
1. On Thursday, a majority of the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit sitting en banc practically begged the U.S. Supreme Court to upend campaign finance law yet again by allowing coordinated campaign expenditures. For the majority, Judge Jeff Sutton first explained what’s going on: At issue is whether the Federal Election Campaign Act’s limits on coordinated campaign expenditures, which restrict political parties from spending money on campaign advertising with input from the party’s candidate for office, violate the First Amendment. In 2001, the Supreme Court held that they do not. FEC v. Colo. Republican Fed. Campaign Comm., 533 U.S. 431, 465. In this action, the plaintiffs argue that the law and facts have changed since 2001, making the Colorado decision no longer binding on lower courts.
  https://assets.journa.host/media_attachments/files/113/094/196/842/276/672/original/07ef39215eca8d09.jpeg
2. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: substackcdn.com
  Dick Cheney endorses Kamala Harris. It really is this serious.
  from Chris Geidner
  Also: Another reminder of the dangers of a second Trump administration to the federal judiciary. And: Justice Sam Alito's stocks.

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice