Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://fosstodon.org/users/danielskatz/statuses/113091251382976154">Daniel S. Katz (danielskatz@fosstodon.org)'s status on Saturday, 07-Sep-2024 00:14:05 JST</a><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@danielskatz" title="danielskatz@fosstodon.org"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/112920-48-20230417064038.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Daniel S. Katz" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Daniel S. Katz</a></section><article><p>"Artificial intelligence is worse than humans in every way at summarising documents and might actually create additional work for people, a government trial of the technology has found."</p><p>from <a href="https://www.crikey.com.au/2024/09/03/ai-worse-summarising-information-humans-government-trial/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.crikey.com.au/2024/09/03/ai-worse-summarising-information-humans-government-trial/</a></p><p>The executive summary of the report (<a href="https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=b4fd6043-6626-4cbe-b8ee-a5c7319e94a0" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=b4fd6043-6626-4cbe-b8ee-a5c7319e94a0</a> includes) "The final assessment results of the PoC showed that out of a maximum of 75 points, the aggregated human summaries scored 61 (81%) and the aggregated Gen AI summaries scored 35 (47%)."</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3624524#notice-7105819">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-09-07T00:14:05+09:00" title="Saturday, 07-Sep-2024 00:14:05 JST">about 3 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@danielskatz/113091251382976154" rel="external" title="Sent from fosstodon.org via ActivityPub">fosstodon.org</a></span></span><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@danielskatz/113091251382976154">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><article><header><div>Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.crikey.com.au</div><h5><a href="https://www.crikey.com.au/2013/04/11/the-1-billion-taxpayer-funded-tassie-forestry-gravy-train/">The $1 billion taxpayer-funded Tassie forestry gravy train</a></h5><div> from <span>Crikey</span></div></header><div>The Tasmanian forestry industry is out for the count. But it is taking $1 billion in taxpayer dollars with it, writes Tasmania-based freelance writer John Lawrence.</div><footer></footer></article></li><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/3131475">Untitled attachment</a></label><br></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Daniel S. Katz (danielskatz@fosstodon.org)'s status on Saturday, 07-Sep-2024 00:14:05 JST Daniel S. Katz
"Artificial intelligence is worse than humans in every way at summarising documents and might actually create additional work for people, a government trial of the technology has found."
from https://www.crikey.com.au/2024/09/03/ai-worse-summarising-information-humans-government-trial/
The executive summary of the report (https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=b4fd6043-6626-4cbe-b8ee-a5c7319e94a0 includes) "The final assessment results of the PoC showed that out of a maximum of 75 points, the aggregated human summaries scored 61 (81%) and the aggregated Gen AI summaries scored 35 (47%)."
In conversationabout 3 months ago from fosstodon.orgpermalink
Attachments
1. Domain not in remote thumbnail source whitelist: www.crikey.com.au
  The $1 billion taxpayer-funded Tassie forestry gravy train
  from Crikey
  The Tasmanian forestry industry is out for the count. But it is taking $1 billion in taxpayer dollars with it, writes Tasmania-based freelance writer John Lawrence.
2. Untitled attachment

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice