Embed Notice

HTML Code

<blockquote style="position: relative; padding-left: 55px;"><section><a href="https://chaos.social/users/drazraeltod/statuses/113086139120972773">Cegorach (drazraeltod@chaos.social)'s status on Friday, 06-Sep-2024 23:27:30 JST</a><a href="https://chaos.social/@drazraeltod" title="drazraeltod@chaos.social"><img src="https://gnusocial.jp/avatar/110258-48-20231228145205.webp" width="48" height="48" alt="Cegorach" style="position: absolute; left: 0; top: 0;">Cegorach</a><div><a href="https://norden.social/@Nichtsdestotrotz/113084750062360145" rel="in-reply-to">in reply to</a><ul><li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/84272" title="nichtsdestotrotz@norden.social">Nichtsdestotrotz</a></li><li><a href="https://gnusocial.jp/user/159916" title="bwana@discordian.social">ʙwɑnɑ нoɴoʟʊʟʊ :kverified:</a></li></ul></div></section><article><p><a href="https://norden.social/@Nichtsdestotrotz">@Nichtsdestotrotz</a> <a href="https://discordian.social/@bwana">@bwana</a> <a href="https://strangeobject.space/@esther">@esther</a> clicked through 2-3 links to find that post by Marc Burrows on (now) shitter:</p><p>In 1996 Terry Pratchett interviewed Bill Gates for GQ and accurately predicted how the internet would propagate and legitimise fake news. Gates didn’t believe him.</p></article><footer><a rel="bookmark" href="https://gnusocial.jp/conversation/3624328#notice-7105396">In conversation</a><time datetime="2024-09-06T23:27:30+09:00" title="Friday, 06-Sep-2024 23:27:30 JST">about 9 months ago</time> <span>from <span><a href="https://chaos.social/@drazraeltod/113086139120972773" rel="external" title="Sent from chaos.social via ActivityPub">chaos.social</a></span></span><a href="https://chaos.social/@drazraeltod/113086139120972773">permalink</a><h4>Attachments</h4><ol><li><label><a rel="external" href="https://gnusocial.jp/attachment/3131302">TP: Let's say I call myself the Institute for Something-or-other and I decide to promote a apurious treatise saying the Jews Werke entirely responsible for the second World War and the Holocaust didn't happen.
And it goes out there on the Internet and is available on the same terms as any piece of historical research which has undergone peer review and so on. there's a kind of parity of esteem of information on the Net. It's all there: there's no way of finding out whether this stuff has any bottom to it or whether someone has just made it up.BG: Not for long. Electronics gives us a way of classifying things. You will have authorities on the Net and because an article is contianed in their index it will mean something. For all practical purposes, there'll be an infinite amount of text out there and you'll only eher receive a piece of text through levels of direction, like a friend who says, "Hey, go read this", or a brand name which is associated with a group of referees, or a particular expert, or consumer reports, or the equivalent of a newspaper…
The whole way that you can check somebody's reputation will be so much Mord sophisticated on the Net than it is in print today.</a></label><br><a href="https://assets.chaos.social/media_attachments/files/113/086/092/576/332/072/original/49df4ac7c8d82b7f.jpg" rel="external">https://assets.chaos.social/media_attachments/files/113/086/092/576/332/072/original/49df4ac7c8d82b7f.jpg</a></li></ol></footer></blockquote>

Corresponding Notice

Embed this notice
Cegorach (drazraeltod@chaos.social)'s status on Friday, 06-Sep-2024 23:27:30 JSTCegorach
in reply to
@Nichtsdestotrotz @bwana @esther clicked through 2-3 links to find that post by Marc Burrows on (now) shitter:
In 1996 Terry Pratchett interviewed Bill Gates for GQ and accurately predicted how the internet would propagate and legitimise fake news. Gates didn’t believe him.
In conversationabout 9 months ago from chaos.socialpermalink
Attachments
1. TP: Let's say I call myself the Institute for Something-or-other and I decide to promote a apurious treatise saying the Jews Werke entirely responsible for the second World War and the Holocaust didn't happen. And it goes out there on the Internet and is available on the same terms as any piece of historical research which has undergone peer review and so on. there's a kind of parity of esteem of information on the Net. It's all there: there's no way of finding out whether this stuff has any bottom to it or whether someone has just made it up. BG: Not for long. Electronics gives us a way of classifying things. You will have authorities on the Net and because an article is contianed in their index it will mean something. For all practical purposes, there'll be an infinite amount of text out there and you'll only eher receive a piece of text through levels of direction, like a friend who says, "Hey, go read this", or a brand name which is associated with a group of referees, or a particular expert, or consumer reports, or the equivalent of a newspaper… The whole way that you can check somebody's reputation will be so much Mord sophisticated on the Net than it is in print today.
  https://assets.chaos.social/media_attachments/files/113/086/092/576/332/072/original/49df4ac7c8d82b7f.jpg

Public

Embed Notice

HTML Code

Corresponding Notice